Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

James Randi - Cant Prove a Negative

James Randi lecture excerpt from a 2 hour lecture at Caltech in 1992. James Randi explains why you can not prove a negative. The burden of proof is on the person presenting the claim. He then goes into an example of how you can't prove that Reindeer can fly.

  • Views: 2109
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:Board James
  • Board James
  • Looks like AVGN (James Rolfe) is reviewing board games.
  • Votes 4.73/5 - Views 5292 - Comments 23

View All



Trouble playing the media? Click here to manually download it.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

4.66 out of 5 based on 382 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

13 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

gardendaleguy : LVL 38: VP 4.6: said:

gardendaleguy

Hidden (Show Comment) -22 votes

16 days 19 hours ago...

he said "stick them on the world trade center" ..pause for silence...
LOL!

ratbag1410 : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

ratbag1410

20 votes NegativePositive

16 days 1 hour ago...

^ what was funny about the WTC 1n 1992??

Zodd_25 : LVL 31: VP 4: said:

Zodd_25

9 votes NegativePositive

16 days 1 hour ago...

i love james randi, "write down no.... really NO" funniest non comedic guy i know.

Asuka : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

Asuka

9 votes NegativePositive

14 days 7 hours ago...

He is quite funny when trying to prove his point.

Deathhawk : LVL 9: VP 1.8: said:

Deathhawk

4 votes NegativePositive

14 days 7 hours ago...

"Push....." *looks over edge*

lol

yt : LVL 6: VP 1.5: said:

yt

Hidden (Show Comment) -11 votes

14 days 1 hour ago...

"..I don`t know, but here comes another one." lol

You need to prove to me that `you can`t prove a negative` before I believe you.

By being more specific it`s easier to prove things. You can prove that none of those reindeer flew on that particular day. Can prove that a person was not able to use ESP in a particular instance.

And in `reality` the burden of proof, or some evidence, is on both those interested in proving and disproving claims. However proof itself is a bit philosophical and irrelevant anyway. people believe what they want.

It appears God put somebodies head on upside down.

DingoDango : LVL 57: VP 5: said:

DingoDango

-2 votes NegativePositive

13 days 13 hours ago...

I`m an atheist and I love the work that James Randi has done, but I`m just going to have to shit on everyone`s parade here and tell you all that actually, yes, you CAN prove a negative. At least you can in so much as you can prove anything at all.

The really funny irony here is that the proposition "You can`t prove a negative" is a negative itself - so if you could prove it true, it wouldn`t be true! Uh oh!

That deep, intrinsic contradiction alone should turn you away from that erroneous folk logic. But if you`d like to learn more:

http://departments.bloomu.edu/philosophy/pages/content/hales/artic
lepdf/proveanegative.pdf

KuRRopT : LVL 33: VP 4.2: said:

KuRRopT

1 votes NegativePositive

13 days 11 hours ago...

^ Kinda like if nothing is impossible, then it would be impossible for something impossible to exist

fattirefury : LVL 43: VP 5: said:

fattirefury

2 votes NegativePositive

13 days 10 hours ago...

He makes me Randi!

AMWhy : LVL 30: VP 3.9: said:

AMWhy

3 votes NegativePositive

13 days 10 hours ago...

Fermats Last Theorem: x^n + y^n = z^n is impossible if n is greater or equal to 3. This is a negative statement that was proved (after 400 years of top mathematicians trying) by the Brit, Andrew Wiles in 1995. Negatives can be proved.

Good video though - informative and entertaining!

Dionysus187 : LVL 32: VP 4.1: said:

Dionysus187

0 votes NegativePositive

13 days 5 hours ago...

may be able to prove a negative, but the fact remains that the burden of proof is on the person that is making the claim of a positive. Or at the very least, the initial claim.

DingoDango : LVL 57: VP 5: said:

DingoDango

1 votes NegativePositive

12 days 12 hours ago...

Wow, I can`t believe I got downvoted for speaking the truth. You guys are making atheists look bad. Fucking religious atheist idiots. You are the same as the those you denounce.

exploder : LVL 50: VP 5: said:

exploder

0 votes NegativePositive

12 days 7 hours ago...

^ I agree DingoDango. I vote up intelligent contributions whether I agree or not, unless they are really super bad fucked on principle (Csmack the Catholic butlick comes to mind, haven`t heard from him for a good while).

All this down voting is pretty intolerant. Like yt`s comment above, quite reasonable, something to think about, and I have to agree that reality is messier than principle and the burden of proof / evidence rests with both parties to some degree.

Randi does not deserve vain God status people.

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009