Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

Iraq Vet Dies After Receiving Cancerous ...

An Iraq war veteran died after receiving cancerous lungs from a heavy smoker in a transplant.

Matthew Millington, 31, a corporal in the Queen’s Royal Lancers, had the operation to save him from an incurable respiratory condition.

But the organs were from a donor who was believed to have smoked 30 to 50 roll-up cigarettes a day. A tumor was found after the transplant, and its growth was accelerated by the drugs that Mr Millington took to prevent his body rejecting the organs.

Because he was a cancer patient, he was not allowed to receive a further pair of lungs, under hospital rules. The soldier had radiotherapy but died at home in Stoke-on-Trent in February last year.

His widow, Siobhan, said: “All Matthew wanted was another set of lungs. He said: ‘They have given me a dud pair, get me another set’. He thought he could beat it, but his condition deteriorated so fast from then.”

Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, the country’s main heart and lung transplant center, carried out the operation. It said that early X-rays on the organs did not find any signs of cancer.

Mr Millington had learned that he had a serious lung condition in 2006 and was given two years to live unless he had a transplant.

A donor was found and the double lung transplant went ahead in April 2007. The cancer was discovered only six months after the operation, because of a lack of communication between radiographers and consultants. The tumor had grown from 9mm to 13mm in that period.

An inquest was told last week that an internal investigation at Papworth pinpointed a string of problems, including difficulties with communication, record-keeping and patient handover.

In Mr Millington’s case a radiographer had failed to highlight the growth of the cancerous tumor.

Discounting verdicts of neglect or misadventure, Ian Smith, the North Staffordshire Coroner, delivered a narrative verdict, recording that Mr Millington had died from “complications of transplant surgery”.

The hospital defended using smokers’ lungs for transplants, saying that all organs were screened rigorously.

Speaking after the inquest, Mr Millington’s father Lester, 61, said: “I have never contemplated further action. I wanted to get to the inquest but I was 99.9 per cent certain that nothing they did wrong was done wrong wilfully. It is a fact that 51 per cent of all lungs transplanted at Papworth come from donors who smoked.

“Without using such lungs many more people would die without receiving a transplant.”

Source

  • Views: 1264
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:Brain Transplant
  • Brain Transplant
  • A young girl had been suffering from severe headaches a. . .
  • Votes 4/5 - Views 77 - Comments 0
  • Video:Dog With Human Butt
  • Dog With Human Butt
  • This dog looks like he was the victim of a horrible but. . .
  • Votes 3.7/5 - Views 383 - Comments 5

View All



Rate This News:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

4.78 out of 5 based on 371 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

New URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

15 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

Sev : LVL 42: VP 5: said:

Sev

30 votes NegativePositive

159 days 8 hours ago...

What the fuck? If you put a shitty lung into someone, you are obligated to have an exchange policy. Fuckin hospital bureaucracy is part of the reason why health care is so expensive in america.

Phi : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

Phi

-3 votes NegativePositive

159 days 7 hours ago...

`Queen`s Royal Lancers`

Sorry, but the bureaucracy is even worse over in England where this occurred. And where the medicine is socialized.

fatninja : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

fatninja

17 votes NegativePositive

159 days 7 hours ago...

Why the fuck would they use smoker`s lungs? Its like letting a alcoholic donate his liver and kidneys.

Hoemo : LVL 25: VP 3.4: said:

Hoemo

-5 votes NegativePositive

159 days 6 hours ago...

^huh?>

sc1zzen : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

sc1zzen

20 votes NegativePositive

159 days 6 hours ago...

I thought they had testing and screening of donor organs?

moral of the story NEVER BUY USED OR REFURBISHED.

Riotshoes : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

Riotshoes

3 votes NegativePositive

159 days 4 hours ago...

That story`s pretty fucked up :(
Poor guy.

mostafa.redha : LVL 42: VP 5: said:

mostafa.redha

4 votes NegativePositive

159 days 2 hours ago...

That`s really fucked up, I mean a smokers lung is actually black in colour... How could they have missed that?!

MarkKLC : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

MarkKLC

-2 votes NegativePositive

159 days 2 hours ago...

The only fucked up part was missing the tumor.

It`d be more fucked up if they didn`t use smoker`s lungs and just let all the people on the waiting list die from no transplants at all.

PokeyGorilla : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

PokeyGorilla

-2 votes NegativePositive

159 days 1 hour ago...

Don`t let the conservatives get wind of this or we`ll never get socialized medicine in the U.S.

leoleotheiii : LVL 35: VP 4.3: said:

leoleotheiii

2 votes NegativePositive

159 days 1 hour ago...

^its not like he lived much longer....who the hell puts up their lung for donation when they smoke that much??? its like murdering someone AFTER you die....

Niscimble : LVL 43: VP 5: said:

Niscimble

3 votes NegativePositive

159 days 1 hour ago...

@Sev

This didn`t happen in America buddy...

DarkStar7 : LVL 23: VP 3.2: said:

DarkStar7

2 votes NegativePositive

159 days ago...

it`s common practice in england due to short supply of organs. Either be stuck to a ventilator machine until a good lung comes risking infection and complications of the ventilation machine OR take your chances with a lung from a smoker that is still usuable. Unfortunately for him, the lung, had cancer. They should have screened it though.

Lapz : LVL 30: VP 3.9: said:

Lapz

1 votes NegativePositive

158 days 20 hours ago...

no you guys have slightly the wrong idea

the lung DIDN`T have any signs of cancer when it was transplanted. The problem is that they should have noticed it sooner when it DID develop, it took them 6 months to check and notice and this was too long. As a medical student I`m 99% sure this is what they meant to say

also they refused him another transplant because lung cancer can easily spread to other parts of the body, there is little point in transplanting new lungs into someone who is going to die from metastasis in other organs

rawrimadinosaur : LVL 39: VP 4.7: said:

rawrimadinosaur

-2 votes NegativePositive

158 days 16 hours ago...

^ whoa we have med students that go on spiked

Mr6Sozac : LVL 36: VP 4.4: said:

Mr6Sozac

1 votes NegativePositive

158 days 8 hours ago...

after all the commercials about lung cancer!
you`re telling me a hospital full of professionals could not see it?
you could clearly see the lungs were cancerous at least
in the commercials X_X

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009