Upgrade your browser!

Skip to Content

3 Buildings fell down on September 11, 2...

I did not know that a 47 story building that was NOT hit by a plane on 9/11 fell down into its own footprint until about 6 months ago. I used to laugh at the conspiracy nuts until I learned about Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Here Richard Gage (20+ year experienced engineer) discusses the facts regarding Building 7. The facts are now clear to me, 9/11 was a controlled demolition. http://www.ae911truth.org/

  • Views: 845
  • All Ages
  • All Ages

Related Media

  • Video:The 911 Hoax
  • The 911 Hoax
  • Re-edited an old video, so will we let them get away wi. . .
  • Votes 2.97/5 - Views 234 - Comments 4
  • Video:Don`t Be Revolting
  • Don`t Be Revolting
  • I don`t know what it is about this clip from Blackadder. . .
  • Votes 4.55/5 - Views 3267 - Comments 13
  • Video:The 911 Hoax
  • The 911 Hoax
  • So will we let them get away with this?
  • Votes 3.09/5 - Views 3191 - Comments 47

View All



Trouble playing the media? Click here to manually download it.

Rate This Video:
Rate it 0.5 Rate it 1.0 Rate it 1.5 Rate it 2.0 Rate it 2.5 Rate it 3.0 Rate it 3.5 Rate it 4.0 Rate it 4.5 Rate it 5.0

3.17 out of 5 based on 132 votes

Rating Results:
Earn XP by sharing this video!
learn more

Video URL:

Embedded Link:

Send This Video To A Cell Phone! Digg

11 Comments

Current View: 15 / Show all Comments

tito_valasques : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

tito_valasques

6 votes NegativePositive

67 days 8 hours ago...

I don`t understand why there are still people around who don`t at the very least find that there are still valid questions unanswered regarding this.

splicing : LVL 30: VP 3.9: said:

splicing

-2 votes NegativePositive

67 days 7 hours ago...

I worked in and around the WTC complex for 12 years before the attacks.

When is this horse shit going to stop about "controlled demolitions"?

Does everyone realize that besides being an office building, 7 WTC also was home to a Con Edison substation?

In the event of a power failure, the substation would be able to produce electricity from generators supplied by diesel fuel. Hence, the building contained tanks (24,000 gallons) of diesel fuel.

When 1 WTC collapsed, 7 WTC, along with 140 West Street (Verizon), were pierced internally by falling steel beams, thus damaging the infrastructure of the substation and providing enough fuel to sustain the fire that ultimately weakened the building to the point of collapse.

140 West Street was saved due to the fact that it was "overbuilt". Original telephone equipment was constructed with cast iron and occupied virtually the entire lower section of the building (~13 floors).

praise jebus : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

praise jebus

4 votes NegativePositive

67 days 2 hours ago...

^ and these generators were perfectly placed so that the if they were comprimised the building would do a free fall? Stop sucking off Uncle Sam and use your head. If you start thinking for yourself and stop ass raping the American dream then maybe you could get beyond a vegtitative state. I love America but do I trust it? Hell no.

tito_valasques : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

tito_valasques

3 votes NegativePositive

66 days 18 hours ago...

@splicing - If that is true, it still doesn`t account for anything. Fire from diesel fuel does not melt steel and why the hell would an architect design a building that wouldn`t withstand the possibility of that kind of fire.
I have no intention to speculate about who did it and why - all I`m saying is that there are way too many coincidences for this not to raise questions.

bugaboo171 : LVL 31: VP 4: said:

bugaboo171

-3 votes NegativePositive

66 days 18 hours ago...

More tinfoil hat conspiracy nonsence. I bet I could find an expert who would testify that my cat was behind the 9/11 attacks.

dude_from_detroit : LVL 30: VP 3.9: said:

dude_from_detroit

4 votes NegativePositive

66 days 15 hours ago...

^well that explains it you own a cat

splicing : LVL 30: VP 3.9: said:

splicing

2 votes NegativePositive

66 days 6 hours ago...

Instead of insults, praise jebus, try absorbing some logic.

- The structure of the building was compromised by falling debris

- A fire burned, unabated, for about 7 hours INSIDE of the building

-Substantial fuel sources were available to explain the "explosions" heard

- Demolition of a skyscraper with explosives takes far more than 7 hours to prepare (in some cases months).

- There are ZERO reports from any of the 50,000+ people who worked in the WTC complex on a daily basis of any suspicious activity (explosive delivery and placement) before 9/11/01.

- FDNY was aware of the possibility of disaster:

"Fire Department officials warned the city and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1998 and 1999 that a giant diesel fuel tank for the mayor`s $13 million command bunker in 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story high-rise that burned and collapsed on Sept. 11, posed a hazard and was not consistent with city fire codes. The 6,000-gallon tank was positioned about 15 feet above the ground floor and near several lobby elevators and was meant to fuel generators that would supply electricity to the 23rd-floor bunker in the event of a power failure. Although the city made some design changes to address the concerns - moving a fuel pipe that would have run from the tank up an elevator shaft, for example - it left the tank in place. But the Fire Department repeatedly warned that a tank in that position could spread fumes throughout the building if it leaked, or, if it caught fire, could produce what one Fire Department memorandum called "disaster."

Grothesk : LVL 37: VP 4.5: said:

Grothesk

2 votes NegativePositive

66 days 3 hours ago...

"I did not know that a 47 story building that was NOT hit by a plane on 9/11 fell down into its own footprint until about 6 months ago." I`m assuming you`re currently 7 or were recently introduced to the Internet.

We don`t need another 9/11 is a conspiracy video. People make fun of you guys for a reason.

praise jebus : LVL 34: VP 4.2: said:

praise jebus

2 votes NegativePositive

66 days 2 hours ago...

^^ Splicing...I would love to leave the insults out and if you would stop insulting everyone else by writing your dribble then we could call call a truce.

Now facts.....skycrapers have burned for over a day and never fallen down.....yet #7 burns for a few hours and it does a perfect free fall? Lets just say that the fire did cause the collapse. would it be a collapse into its own footprint? What are the chances?

I quote you...."Demolition of a skyscraper with explosives takes far more than 7 hours to prepare (in some cases months"......I agree. and this is so the building will do a free fall and not harm any person or property. So how did a poorly placed fuel tank cause a perfect free fall?

once again. stop sucking off uncle sam and use your head.

splicing : LVL 30: VP 3.9: said:

splicing

1 votes NegativePositive

65 days 19 hours ago...

praise jebus:

There was actually more than one fuel tank in the building. The tank referred to in the FDNY report was there to serve a generator for the so called "bunker" - NYC`s command center in the event of a disaster. Con Edison`s generators were fed from separate tank(s).

Why the building fell in a similar manner to one that is purposefully demolished - I do not know.
In the same context, why did the building in Turkey roll over instead of collapsing?

http://www.spikedhumor.com/articles/187365/Epic-Demolition-Fail.html

Question:

When were the supposed explosives placed?

meshblorg : LVL 21: VP 3: said:

meshblorg

1 votes NegativePositive

65 days 5 hours ago...

47 story building to the ground in 7 seconds at freefall speeds... it wasn`t hit by a plane and instead it fell down neatly into its own footprint... yes this is clearly the work of burning debree and diesel fuel *sarcasm*. In fact why don`t all demolition experts just take down building this way!? I mean look at how well it worked on 3 buildings!

Just look at who stands to gain from all this. Use your skepticism and if you`re all so confident what would hurt in having a new and proper investigation?

What about the evidence of ignited Thermite found?

Believe me I`ve laughed and argued against 9/11 truthers for years but it wasn`t until I learned about Richard Gage and his architects and engineers for 9/11 truth organization. They`re not saying who did what but what they ARE saying is that the facts in the official report don`t add up. They are objective and a new investigation is the proper and just thing to do.

Post a Comment:

Avatar


The Spikedhumor Drawing!Drawing Coming Soon!
Prize
Entry Dates: 9/8/2007-9/14/2009